Psychology Essay Example: Art and Illusion

If you are among the students who are struggling with writing a psychology essay, we have good news for you! We asked one of our writers to prepare a free psychology essay example for you in order to inspire you and give some “food for thought.” The author has analyzed the essence of one method described in Ernst H. Gombrich’s book in a sample essay and we hope this topic will also be interesting for you. For more inspiration, don’t forget to check other psychology essay examples that are available on our blog. We should mention that copying parts of our texts and including them unchanged in your own paper may be considered plagiarism. In order to keep a good reputation, use proper citations and wisely repurpose this text.

We know that there are many situations where you are unable to write an essay on your own, but you still need to have a complete paper in your hands. Don’t worry – for these cases you can use our service! With the help of our gifted writers you have the chance to be on time with your deadlines, as our writers will writer the essay for you! Just make an order and stay calm.

What Is the Essence of Method Of “Making and Matching” Described in Art and Illusion by Ernst H. Gombrich?

In “Art and Illusion”, Gombrich raises the following key question: why different nations, during different ages have such different representations of the visible world? Using philosophy, science and psychology, Gombrich aims at addressing this essential question all along his book.

Gombrich points out that, once established, the “realistic” mode is continuously polished by the idea that “making comes before matching”. As the author recalls, the artist starts trialing his creative product in opposition to the observable world and attempts to reliably represent that reality (Gombrich, 1977). In other words, one has to know what might be said so as to hear what was said.

The concept became known as “making and matching” and is based on the notion of “schemata”, which suggests that the artist doesn’t begin with a visual representation, but with his own concept or idea (Wollheim, 1973). Also, the author points out that the artist adapts this idea to fit, as much as possible, the subject of the artwork: a person, scenery, or an object.

Hence, the well known sequence of Greek art regarding “naturalism” is confirmed: each generation of artists fits the noticeable world more appropriate than their precursors.

In conclusion, “making and matching”, the epitome of “Art and Illusion”, suggests that artists, before they even think of reproducing what they see in front of their eyes, take mental shots by manipulating inherited “schemata” that appoints the surrounding reality by the convention force.

Works Cited

  1. Bryson, N. 1983. Vision and Painting: The Logic of the Gaze. London, Macmillan.
  2. Gombrich, E.H. 1977. Art and Illusion: a Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. London, Phaidon. 5th edition.
  3. Wollheim, R. 1973. On Art and the Mind: Essays and Lectures. London, Allen Lane.